SLX: prisoner of war / missing in action
 

I am holding a vigil thread, right here.

On August 31, 2001 in a day that will live in infamy, SLX was banned. This is the official notice he received from TANK GIRL:
"You have been suspended for your continuous trolling of the forum with hostile and harassing posts against other members, mods and admins included. You may contact Gaz and discuss your possible unsuspension after a few weeks when he comes back if you are still interested to return."

And not only was SLX banned, but so was the rest of his family. TANK GIRL assumed (or justified) wrongly that other members of his family were SLX clones.

SLX should not have been banned. The banning was an example of managing too much, on the part of TANK GIRL. In my humble opinion TANK GIRL is no longer worthy of her job, and should step down or be removed.

That's all I have to say for now in this vigil, and may I add for SLX:
you are not forgotten.

You are going to wear out your keyboard before you make any progress eclectica. It's done, and it won't change no matter how many threads are started or bumped about it. That was proven before when certain members were suspended.

http://www.the-waltons.com/fampor.jpg


Now then. Which one was "Gossiper" again?

Family Affair:D

Episode One:


The Walton household: dead of night.

John Boy: "MA! MA! I've been suspended!"

Ma: (Rushes to the computer) "Well, what is it that caused such a thing to happen, son?"

JB: "I really have no idea, Ma, I was just havin' a little fun, is all."

Ma: "Here, let me see if my account still logs." *clickity-clickity*

(Pa enters room)

Pa: "What's all this trouble in the middle of the night, son?"

Ma: "Well, looks like a glitch to me. I don't seem to be able to get in. You'll have to go to the store in the morning, send a telegram."

JB: "You try Pa, will ya? I only wanna little more fun."

Pa: "Well, alright, boy. But this better be good." *clickity-clickity*

(Grampa enters room)

John boy looks: goggle-eyed

JB: "That's incredible, Grampa. You've been dead since 1978."

Grampa: "Yeah, I know, but I have to try to log in.."

Pa: "Well, I've tried, son, but I can't just seem to fix it. You'll just have to do without for the time being."

Grampa: "Here, let me try." *feeble clicking*

JB: "You're looking good, for a dead man, Gramps."

Grampa: "Why thankee, boy. Nope... Nope.... What was my password again?"

To be continued.....

:eek: .....:att:

DAWN, I'm looking at your post count, and it's almost at four SLXs, and you're telling me I might wear out my keyboard?

Figure of speech dear. Thats all. :)

http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vz...he_real_SLX.jpg

Remember when the Russian submarine sank, and their commanders gave up on them? That is not what I'm going to do with poor ole slx.

Here's one for SLX: Beethoven - Moonlight Sonata

This is the music that was used in the movie "Misery". How appropriate; I think TANKGIRL is the lady in the movie.

Yep. The boat is still at the bottom, the crew are still dead, and yes, nobody gives a damn.

Re: SLX: prisoner of war / missing in action
 

Says who???

Kenny Rogers and the First Edition
 

TANKGIRL deleted the content that was within the quotes. Here it is:
http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vz...rst_Edition.htm

you tricked me oscar
I thought it would be some sly and the family stone.

I've been warn'd
 

Sound familiar? Today I check my e-mail, and I see this letter from TANKGIRL:
I found the letter to be professionally written, assuming it is honest. TANKGIRL was correct that indeed those items that I quoted were written by SLX. But TANKGIRL was wrong in assuming that GOSSIPER, KELSTER, and MORTAMER were SLX clones. That's 50-50 in the guessing department. My only wonder is, when TANKGIRL flips her next coin to test a "hunch", will it come up in my favor or not?

So I received a warning rather than an outright suspension, which I am grateful for. Looking back through some of the old threads however, I do not see any of SLX's quotes. The reason why is that TANKGIRL deleted them. Does that mean that I also get a clean slate too, and the next violation will result in a warning rather than a suspension? After all, TANKGIRL asserts I quoted SLX, but then went to delete the said threads, so where's the proof? I'll tell you now that I could play a game like that, but I won't: I'll just be my honest self, in the interests of my own credibility, and admit to what was done. I hope it's a level playing field here.

But realistically it's not. I don't know what goes on behind the scenes in e-mails, of some accusing others of this or that. I'm pretty sure that SLX does not have clones, and that TANKGIRL has made a mistake, not only by initially banning him, but by also banning his whole family. There is for example the Gossiper-Ramona factor, which is basically a feud that Gossiper, also known as ROGUE_REPORTER, had in Napster speakout. As I understand it, GOSSIPER was critical of RAMONA, calling her a failed artist who wasn't able to produce music that the masses were interested in. RAMONA got very upset, and put the blame on SLX, and afterwards there was a tension between the two of them. Not that RAMONA is to be confused with TANKGIRL, but it's possible RAMONA said something like this to TANKGIRL: "I know for a fact that GOSSIPER and SLX are the same people.", such that TANKGIRL may get swayed in that direction (or just do a coin toss) more easily. Well that is one of many possibilities, and there are probably a whole bunch at work. Not least of which would be the personal resentment that TANKGIRL feels towards SLX for him calling her some curse words.

Quite a soap opera, as 4947 would say.

That's detergent drama, please quote me correctly.:BL:

Even if the three other users were family members, the 30 seconds between each logging on from the same ISP would be enough for me to thing someone was trying to circumvent the suspension. :ND:

You seem to be the only drama queen left :dir:

Re: I've been warn'd
 

I believe it was an exact IP match. :ND:

Hmmmmmmmmm Thinking about this thread ;)

I was chatting with slx the day before yesterday, and he said some very valid points about all this.

But one thing that I reminded him is that this is indeed a paid for forum, and if it was mine, I'd expect to run things the way I wanted, without having to explain myself to anyone. TankGirl made a decision, and I don't think it's up to us to question that.

Some of you think this place should be completely free of moderation. I for one don't think I'd stick around too long if things weren't kept under control somewhat.

The detergent drama continues...

I'm the only one still going at this theme, but you'd appreciate someone like me if you were in the position of being banned, to have a voice on your behalf.

And those of you who are confident that SLX, GOSSIPER, KELSTER, and MORTAMER are clones of each other, not only are denying them the benefit of the doubt, but also only hearing one side of the story because they're all banned and can't argue their side.

I believe that it's possible that some family members would share the same IP addresses, as they may live under the same roof; and also may be in contact with each other, hence explaining the simultaneous log-ins.

If this forum is anything like a trial (though I understand it's privately maintained), then the burden of proof would be on TANKGIRL to proove that SLX et al. are clones. Then again, if TANKGIRL is really devious, then she could come up with any IP numbers to prove her case. So far TANKGIRL has been mute, except to come in and delete my quotes of SLX.

If it was me, I wouldn't think I should have to explain my actions to anyone. Maybe that's why she isn't replying to all these. Because she really doesn't have to.

http://www.neosoft.com/~meeker/images/pptv.jpg


theflaco

The following are two e-mails I sent TANKGIRL last night, asking for clarification of the rule which prohibits quoting of banned members:
It may seem to you as absurd if I ask these questions, but a person who enforces rules, and expects them to be taken seriously, should be able to answer questions like these, or at least try to.

Eclectica......I'm just sitting here wondering.....have you spoken to these 'other' members? I mean you and ol' slx seem to be pretty good buds ... it would be dead easy to for him to prove to you, at least, that they are all seperate entities.....and then you would be able to post the 'facts' as opposed to suppositions.

DAWN, what you say is very possibly what's going on here. No need for rules when you think about it, as that would suggest that there would be explainable reasons (rather than an arbitrary decision) for banning someone. Maybe TANKGIRL's motto is "kill them all; let Gaz sort them out".

I doubt that's true, otherwise you'd be gone too. :hmm:

ALBANIAN WENCH, I have not spoken to the other members, and I must say that I'm not 100% sure. My feeling though is that these others are not SLX clones. I think they are reluctant to have to come out and prove themselves, as they would have to give up their privacy to do so.

However, the burden of proof is on TANKGIRL (DAWN disagrees with this) to prove that these people (GOSSIPER, KELSTER, and MORTAMER) are all SLX clones.

Keep in mind that we've only been hearing one side of the story, as I've been prohibited from posting SLX's quotes.

I have indeed heard both sides.

But surely they would be willing to do such a small thing for their 'family' member?



But slx is still posting at RLD isnt he? And a lot of the members here read and post there as well.....personally I havent seen anything convincing there for slx's side.

I don't believe anyone has made the statement that Mortimer, Gossiper and Kelster are not definately legit members. But the evidence does support the idea that slx has access to these names and passwords so that he could log on with them himself... which is evidently what he did.

And clearly, giving a suspended member access to the forum through another person's account subjects the other person to suspension as well.

Hahahahaha

:tu:

:BL::BL::tu:

For all of you that are worried about the fate of the ill-treated troll family I am pleased to inform you that at least the head of the family is well and alive and has been seen at RLD, a nice unmoderated forum admined by my esteemed colleague Sixx. If I understand correctly Nicobie has already made some friendly inquiries about the rest of the family - maybe he can enlighten us more about their state and fate. :CG: Anyway, I am sure they all will show up there in due time and start posting as their own distinct personalities so that we learn to know them all better and can see with our own eyes what a symphatetic bunch of Napsterites lovers they are.

Meanwhile I recommend eclectica to have himself invited to a family dinner to their house to meet the main characters as well as the rest of the passionately lurking family. This of course assuming that we are not talking about a closed institution where visitors are not allowed. :BL:

- tg ;)

Large Pot?

Shit?

Stirrer?

Tg!!


Tut-tut. :no:


EDIT: Missed a line: Obviously, though, give the monkeys enough guns & ammo and they will shoot themselves.

Re: SLX: prisoner of war / missing in action
 

http://members.tripod.co.uk/ranger121/Virgil.gif

My take on this
 

Don't know if anyone has noticed lately, but after being a semi-permanent fixture here, I have become extremely scarce. I gather slx has been has been doing some trolling. Though I do not know the exact nature of the trolls, it does make me think about the nature of the censorship that goes on in this forum.

Let's face, we all are adults here. I myself had a post deleted because of some bathroom humour. I did not think it was deletable material, it was a pretty light reference. I was highly insulted, given that at the time there were active threads about wanting boob and wee-wee pics.

If there's anything that pisses me off it's double standards! Since I wasn't in the "in" crowd, I got the short end of the deal.

I feel that slx is getting the same treatment.

Quoth Dawnie:

I was chatting with slx the day before yesterday, and he said some very valid points about all this.

But one thing that I reminded him is that this is indeed a paid for forum, and if it was mine, I'd expect to run things the way I wanted, without having to explain myself to anyone. TankGirl made a decision, and I don't think it's up to us to question that.

I agree. But unfortunately, strong censorship is quite unpopular, and not likely to keep readership high. The proof is not allowing anyone to question the policy.

Some of you think this place should be completely free of moderation. I for one don't think I'd stick around too long if things weren't kept under control somewhat.

Why does everyone think that moderation on this forum an all-or-nothing affair? There's way too much moderation, including the "bleeping" of supposedly foul language. Wake up! We are adults and that language is fairly commonplace. It's a nice utopia, but not at all realistic.

Seeing this kind of conflict only convinces me that I do not need the kind of bullcrap that goes on in this place, where posters are kept on a tight leash and mods and admins are on total power trips. And hey, sometimes trolls add a little fun and interesting reading!

Go ahead, flame me, but I'm not afraid to voice an unpopular opinion.

Practice what you preach!
 

Quoth Tankgirl:

This of course assuming that we are not talking about a closed institution where visitors are not allowed.

Then why does this site require registration to even view the posts?

Hey doggie, I did a poll not too long ago that asked how people felt that suspensions should be dealt with.

Alot of people commented that they thought we should get rid of moderation all together, even tho that's now what I was asking. My statement was in response to that.

And by the way, I had a harmless cartoon pic "removed" ( I was asked to remove it, or it would be removed for me, so I removed it) too. I thought it was a harmless cartoon, in my opinion. So it wasn't just you. :hmm:

Re: Practice what you preach!
 

Why do you even ask... this is a closed institution! :BL: :att:

Seriously, Gaz should be back in 2-3 weeks and as soon as he has settled down and counted all his gold he'll surely evaluate the question of visitors and opening up the automatic registration. Until that we'll probably continue with the current system.

- tg ;)

http://www.cmp.ucr.edu/students/Bee...ear%20%233).gif


Lay me now in a satin box. Trapped in a box of never ending walls. Stuck in a purgatory mirrored by life. Punishment for my crime? Look for the light and the tunnel. Feel the everlasting heat. I present myself here. Placed here for you to strip me of sin...strip me of the filth...strip me of this torturous place.

Anybody give a shit about how I feel about the registration? Too bad, I'm gonna give it anyway.

The forum used to be open to everyone. New members came in, not alot, but slow and steady.

Then a some of the members decided that it would be "fun" to create several alias's. So many were created that it caused much trouble for a while. Basically, it was turmoil if I remember correctly.

So the rules were changed requiring alias's to post their orignal user name in their profile. When people didn't bother to comply with that, the rules were changed to say only 2 names per user.

Of course people couldnt just follow the rules, so that's why the registration is the way it is today. A select few ruined it for all of us.

Unfortunatley some still cant follow the rules.

`
 

I most certainly give a shit. You're the most prolific poster on this board! Besides, you're my Dawnie! :V:

First off, I feel bad that you had a harmless cartoon removed. (I wonder what is was...)

I knew some people who wanted to join, but were totally put off by the registration process. Potential good members cast aside.

KDOGG, you're siriusly correct in what you say, that adults will be turned off by such bondage and censorship, and what will remain will be the meek and lobotomized. Administration has no idea how many people are missing in action right now. I know that SLX is gone, JCMD62 is on strike, ECLECTICA is only focused on one issue, but the others may have quit or gone on to other things, without kindly notifying us.

An interesting thing about this. I was "accused" of "kissing up" to the admin after I posted this.

Am I blind? Because I don't see anything here that suggests that I am for or against the decision of the admin on the matter in question.

awwww, shucks :a:

correction tho ;) DarkMan X's forum, me is just his sidekick, kinda like Tanto and shit :BL:

DAWN, I'm reading what you wrote, and I would say that your statement: "TankGirl made a decision, and I don't think it's up to us to question that." here is in favor of the administration. You see, if they can make decisions without you questioning them, then you're on their side, because you're giving them a real easy time. Or do you also have a blind unquestioning faith in what SLX says? And if so, how do you resolve the contradictions?

links
 

For those of you who missed this, here's a good thread by JCMD62:
http://www.napsterites.net/undergro...=&threadid=5136

For those of you who are having SLX withdrawal, go here for some funny pictures, and laugh and reminisce about the good old days!
http://members.aol.com/mavismabone/images

I said the exact same thing to slx in chat, about if I was admin, that I should be able to make decisions without being questioned. He of all people should have known that my statement was simply that. A statement.

I have always been honest with him on this matter. If you and/or him choose not to believe me, then I guess that's your business.

And now I am done with this subject.

YUKY.......... now Dawn has Cooties.


Cooties Cooties Cooties

testing the waters
 

A little back I posted copies of e-mails I sent to TANKGIRL, in regards to the rule which prohibits the quoting of banned members. I have since received no response, so I would like to repost them again here. Also, I ask any of the moderators or administrators to answer this or anyone else who is knowledgeable; not necessarily TANKGIRL. I understand that these questions I pose, are not easy to answer. I'm just asking you to do the best you can, and it's okay to be unsure or to say you don't know too. Here are the questions:

1. How about if I post links to SLX's pictures on a website. Is that a violation?
2. Or how about if I link to SLX's words on another website, or quote old ones SLX wrote in napsterites.net before he was suspended?
3. Is there a statute of limitations for banned members, where their quotes will become public domain after say, 35 years?
4. If SLX is reinstated, can I safely quote him from stuff he wrote during his banned period?
5. If someone has the same style of writing as SLX, and writes about the same things that SLX would write about, and even has the same name as SLX, can I quote that person?

The one I'm most concerned about, is question #2. I would like to link to some current quotes and words of SLX, or link to a site of SLX's, with an .htm file on some website. Here is an example (using GOSSIPER instead of SLX): http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze2fwz4/gossiper.htm

The idea is that the suspended member not be able to communicate to the forum while on suspension. People have already linked to his posts at the RLD. No policy has been established concerning the linking to suspended members... yet. Thanks for the heads up. I'm sure it will be discussed. :att:

i got a post card from SLX . does that count?
:con:

these are the rules and warnings at my buds forum...


http://aybabtu.plc.mb.ca/


By entering this web site, you hereby and without exception agree to the following terms and conditions of use and legal restrictions.;

1) You understand that this website, and all directly associated web sites are wholly owned, operated and hosted in the sovereign province and nation of Manitoba, Canada and are operated in accordance to the applicable laws and statutes of Canada and Manitoba. We make no representation that the materials on this site are appropriate for use outside Canada.

2) You understand that this web site's intended audience are residents of Canada and other countries where use of test cards is considered legal. You understand that the worldwide nature of the internet makes it impossible to regulate the audience and it is possible to access this web site in countries where use of test cards is illegal. You understand that it is your responsibility to check your local laws before committing any information on this website for any given practical use. We do NOT condone signal theft and you are absolutely prohibited from putting ANY information on this site to any illegal use. Any individuals indicating illegal intent are subject to loss of any and all privileges given to them by this web site.

3) You understand that use, possession, distribution, manufacture or importation of test cards is illegal in the United States. If you are a U.S. resident, you are required by law to subscribe and the use or sale of test cards of any kind is unlawful and constitutes signal theft and is subject to criminal and civil penalties according to U.S. law. We do not condone the use or sale of test cards to U.S. residents. In addition, use of test cards may also be considered illegal in any country or jurstiction where the U.S. based services of Directv Inc. and Echostar Communications Corp, in specific, The Dish Network can legally and lawfully distribute their signals, either directly or indirectly and make said signals available for purchase to consumers on a subscription basis.

4) You understand that all information on this web site is informational in nature and is protected by the fundamental right of free speech GUARANTEED by both the United States Constitution and Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As outlined above, although simple access of the information on this site may be legal and protected under various constitutions and charters, physical use may NOT be legal in certain countries and jurstictions, in specific, The United States. If you are in doubt, you should seek legal advice BEFORE putting any information on this site to a practical use.

5) You understand that this web site does NOT sell, lease, rent, manufacture, import, export, install or distribute test cards of ANY kind. In addition, we do NOT sell products of ANY kind, either directly or indirectly, nor do we offer any consultation in regards to any of the content contained in this web site. Please do not even ask.

6) You understand that you are solely responsible for your own actions and agree to hold this web site and its principals harmless for any difficulties incured through physical use of any of the information contained on this web site.

7) This web site is not affliated in any way, shape or form, either legally or professionally with Directv Inc.United States Satellite Broadcasting Ltd., Echostar Communications Corp., News Datacom Ltd., News Data Systems Americas or their affliates, both private, commercial, domestic and international.

8) You agree that this Web Site is privately owned and operated. Employees, Agents or Solicitors both direct and indirect of Directv Inc., News Datacom Ltd, NDS Americas Inc. or Echostar Communications Corporation are STRICTLY prohibited from entering this site and are directed to leave immediately. Failure to comply may constitute a criminal act of trespassing.

9) By entering this site, you agree that the laws of the Province of Manitoba, Canada will, without regard to the conflicts of laws or principles of any other foreign nation or jurstiction therof, apply to any and all matters relating to the use of this web site. Furthermore, you understand that any challenge to this web sites operation or legality MUST be in direct reference to Canadian laws and statutes only and must clearly show with documented evidence that Canadian law prohibits exchange of information in relation to reception of foreign broadcasts that are neither lawfully authorized by the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) nor intended for reception in Canada by their broadcasters. In addition, any challenge must also be accompanied with documented evidence that specifically and clearly shows that a Canadian Court of law has successfully upheld a ruling that such exchange of information is in fact unlawful on Canadian soil. In absence of such documentation, any challenge to this web site may NOT be legal and may in fact constitute a criminal act of harassment.

10) You agree that neither of the U.S. based services of Directv Inc. nor Echostar Communications Corp. currently hold ANY distribution rights to their signals on Canadian soil, nor are they considered or legally recognized to be LAWFUL distributors of their respected signals in Canada and are NOT authorized or legally sanctioned to conduct broadcasting services, either directly or indirectly of any kind in Canada in relation to their respected broadcasting signals. Furthermore, as the broadcasting services of Directv Inc. and Echostar Communications Corp. cannot legally be distributed within Canada, their broadcasts have been legally interpreted as "foreign signals" and Canadian Law has also been legally interpreted as NOT currently regulating nor protecting "foreign signals" . Canadian law has been legally interpreted to regulate and protect signals originating ONLY from a "Lawful" Canadian Distributor. This has been decided and UPHELD in several recent Canadian legal proceedings. Court transcripts of these proceedings are available on request.

11) You agree that this web site contains no information in whole or in part relating to ANY LAWFUL Canadian broadcaster. Currently, the broadcasting services of Star Choice Communiations Inc. and Bell Expressvu L.P. whose respected signals are distinctly sovereign in nature and are regulated in full by the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission (C.R.T.C.), are the only LAWFULLY authorized distributors of Direct to Home Services in Canada. Neither Star Choice Communications Inc, nor Bell Expressvu L.P. currently hold ANY distribution or re-broadcast rights to the U.S. Based services of Directv Inc. or Echostar Communications Corp. In addition, it is understood that the current TVRO equipment standard of Directv Inc. or Echostar Communications Corp. is not directly compatible with any LAWFUL Canadian DTH broadcaster. This web site without reservation, recognizes the lawful distributor status of Star Choice Communications Inc. and Bell Expressvu L.P. and offers NO information of any kind relating to either of these distinctly sovereign broadcasting services.

12) You understand that if you do not agree with any of the above conditions, then you are directed to leave now!





I agree! I do not agree!

HEY Spartacus............went and took a peek being Canadian it was an obvious lure very nice layout and huge list of subjects a definate look back for sure.

Just signed for our new home and the offer was accepted :)

the sattelitesx2 came in the sale:)so in about 6 weeks I will need to do some research:)

not sure of course if they work the house was a power of sale so kinda as is.....................but has an apartment attached so my daughter and grandson have a place of there own and maybe a bit of a break for me.

If I recall correctly you know a fair bit about satelites? yes?

I know a thing or two about the subject...yes....


Congrads on the new home...:tu:


This is another good site....they are from Windsor Ontario I believe....


http://www.geocities.com/newbies_home/cst/

thanks a heap:)

Hey, luck is finally on your side these last couple days! Congrats on your new home. :tu:

When's moving day? Soon I hope. And will pics follow? :)

if all goes well November 1st:)

deCSS
 

SPART, here's a site for you:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/

deceased decadence
 

Oh, never mind, I was confusing DSS with DeCSS.

the red light district
 

The "red light district" is an alternative forum (an underground underground forum), located here:
http://www.partylounge.net/tof/
I only recently discovered it. Comparing the the red light district to the napsterites underground, I find the registration process to be less intimidating. You can check out the place without being a member, whereas here you have to register before reading any of the posts. I'm disappointed in the content of most of the posts there, as they're not the types I'm interested in (I tend to like serious posts). However, for those of you who may find the napsterites underground forum dull some time, it's a good alternative.

I have been uncomfortable to go about "business as usual" in the napsterites underground, because of SLX being restricted. You see, I could just come here, and forget that SLX wasn't banned, and have fun, but I know that such a thing wouldn't be right. And remember, that SLX was the ultimate beater of the dead horse, so I owe it to him to keep beating this dead horse.

Here is the member roster of the red light district, with name, date joined, and number of posts. There are 90 members, 702 threads, and 5233 posts. That means the average thread has 7.5 posts. Here in the napsterites underground, the ratio of posts to threads is 14.1.

( * ) ( . ) 07-15-2001 144
aaacbada 07-30-2001 20
albed 08-27-2001 1
alkizz 07-11-2001 164
Amy-Lee 07-08-2001 762
BigPimpin84 07-09-2001 26
bluegerm 07-28-2001 0
Boobalah 08-04-2001 1
Bright Eyes 07-23-2001 0
Britney Spears 07-15-2001 1
bronxyboobsapprentice 07-15-2001 93
Cash-- 07-11-2001 35
Catbert13 07-09-2001 59
chefws 09-06-2001 0
CLONE 07-09-2001 17
Col. Dekker 08-28-2001 16
cornflakeboyee 07-11-2001 53
CZAR 07-09-2001 209
CZAR's MOM 07-13-2001 8
D.O.M. 08-21-2001 11
DarkManX_19 06-07-2001 560
Dovobis 07-08-2001 43
Drakonix 08-21-2001 1
DrGuessWhatChikenButt 07-11-2001 801
eclectica 09-06-2001 3
esteeaz 08-05-2001 57
Eugene 07-14-2001 14
FAGDET 07-14-2001 6
Farmer 09-04-2001 2
fblaguy 07-09-2001 39
Floopster 07-09-2001 7
floydian slip 08-31-2001 5
G. Victor Bermudez 08-25-2001 41
G@Z's Pi|\/|P 07-12-2001 6
gazdet 07-08-2001 12
gazdet's monkee 08-21-2001 5
George W. Bush 08-22-2001 0
Gutrguy 07-09-2001 206
Headbanger 07-08-2001 130
HomerJSimpson 07-23-2001 1
I'll_Do_It_For_A_Dollar 07-12-2001 7563
Ice 07-15-2001 13
I_B_Ballin4Eva 08-30-2001 0
I_Did_It_For_A_Dollar 07-12-2001 8
Jader 09-06-2001 4
Jadesun 07-16-2001 12
jazzmine 08-03-2001 0
jcmd62 07-14-2001 15
Kaddilak Tah 07-10-2001 6
Kallie 07-16-2001 10
kdogg731 09-06-2001 1
Kelster 09-06-2001 0
Mekajinn 07-17-2001 77
moralee 07-16-2001 0
Mos Def 07-07-2001 198
moyix 07-28-2001 1
nicobie 08-22-2001 22
ninombre 08-25-2001 0
NORM 07-31-2001 13
oscar 07-11-2001 18
Pacewon 07-13-2001 6
Pacewuss 08-22-2001 5
Periwinkle Shadow 07-09-2001 233
Piffman 09-06-2001 7
Poop Ship Destroyer 07-09-2001 14
Prince 07-13-2001 11
Ramona A Stone 09-06-2001 0
reychal 07-20-2001 14
rheedy_spars 07-15-2001 26
SammyG 08-26-2001 0
Sc00terx 07-27-2001 0
schmook 09-06-2001 2
SHAFT 08-27-2001 9
Shaqwon 07-10-2001 756
shelby 07-22-2001 8
SiXXGuNNZ 07-08-2001 867
slx 07-14-2001 43
Spart 07-19-2001 23
spirit7 09-05-2001 5
Squid 07-11-2001 100
sunshine3922 07-15-2001 123
Tankgirl 09-06-2001 0
tom9504 08-19-2001 0
twodogpeople 07-08-2001 50
Unregistered 07-14-2001 1
VWguy 07-11-2001 2
walberg_rastafari 08-19-2001 140
Warrior 09-02-2001 3
Zod 09-03-2001 7
~honeybee~ 07-16-2001 12