P2P-Zone

P2P-Zone (http://www.p2p-zone.com/underground/index.php)
-   Forum Camp (http://www.p2p-zone.com/underground/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   SLX: prisoner of war / missing in action (http://www.p2p-zone.com/underground/showthread.php?t=5189)

Jader 10-08-01 04:18 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Belle


It is simply an analogy, in reverse maybe.

I see... well it was certainly an unorthodox way of presenting it -- at least to me. It's not all quite that relative however. As unfortunate as it may be, we can't simply just ban terrorism or evil with the click of a mouse. Oh wait... where was that bin Laden shooting game link again...

;)

10-08-01 04:30 AM

I am unorthodox, and an enigma.:)

gazdet 10-08-01 05:14 AM

/gaz drops in......observes there is obviously no repetitious spamming ;) coz it wouldn't be necessary, right?..... and assures all concerned that discussions are under way.

(p.s "Forum Terrorists", the analogy, how apt.....lol @ Belle.. :BL: )

Jader 10-08-01 05:19 AM

This is the thread that never ends
It just goes on and on, my friends
Some people starting posting in it, not knowing what it was
And they'll continue posting in it just because
This is the thread that never ends...

(repeat infinite times or until knocked unconscious)

10-08-01 05:29 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by gazdet
....(p.s "Forum Terrorists", the analogy, how apt.....lol @ Belle.. :BL: )

aaahh, gaz dude, you make me feel a little better, thanks.:) I like the analogy, it fits--in a bizarre sort of way. Kind of like micro mini pseudoterrorism, or something like that.

Anyway:















"Forum Terrorism Must Be Stopped"

10-09-01 04:30 PM

democracy versus oligarchy
 
Quote:
jader:

Yes, run off to whatever lawless, anarchist board you desire where rules are non-existent and having social responsibilities isn't necessary.
Social responsibilities are existent on both boards. The difference is, that here at napsterites.net, they are enforced by the administration. Thus here they can not really be called "social responsibilities", but rather "forum rules". At RLD social responsibilities are enforced by peer effort.

Quote:
rebel_mom:

CAN THE KIDS COME OUTTA THERE ROOMS NOW PLEASE...................???

I MEAN BE UNBBANNED?
:MAD: CAN I GO OUT AND PLAY MOMMY DEAREST? 9 MB

ranger121 10-09-01 04:34 PM

:RE:

:zzz:

rebel_mom 10-09-01 04:35 PM


THIS MOMMY SAYS YES THEY MAY



NOW IF ONLY i HAD THE POWER TO DELIVER:(

rebel_mom 10-09-01 04:37 PM

:RE: :zzz:


:SP: WAKE UP NOT BEDTIME YET

Headbanger 10-09-01 04:39 PM

Re: democracy versus oligarchy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica

At RLD social responsibilities are enforced by peer effort.

Hmmm, that's a rather broad and curious interpretation of what they do there. :BL:

Maze 10-09-01 05:39 PM

red light - green light - stop ...mother may I? (hehe ...off the wall as hell ...game I used to play as a child) :D

rebel_mom 10-09-01 06:30 PM

WHAT TIME IS IT MISTER WOLF?

10-11-01 04:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by rebel_mom
WHAT TIME IS IT MISTER WOLF?

Time for the mods and admin to stop forcing their "personal" views of negativity and discord on everyone. What they see thru their eyes, does not mean that anyone else views things this way.

Time for members to stop being banned for being themselves and expessing their opinions, even if those opinions are abrasive and tend to piss people off.

Time for those members who are so easily "pissed off" and who's feelings are so easily hurt, to learn to ignore and not keep constantly replying to and provoking the comments of the members that bother them so damn much.

Time for those same members to stop whining and bothering the mods and admin via dozens of crybaby PM's after replying and responding over and over to a member that they obviously dislike, blatently asking for the abuse that is so upsetting to them, and then using the mods to bail them out.

Time for the mods and admin to deal with the whiny ass PM senders as harshly as they do with everyone else, and to realize that these PM senders are just as guilty in the argument as the individual they are crying about.

Time for mods, admin and members alike to remember that this is a BB, and there are a lot more important things to worry about in this world than slx called me a c'unt.

esteeaz 10-11-01 06:32 AM

EVERYONE ALWAYS BITCHES .................BUTT THEY ALWAYS CUM BACK. THE BOARD IS NO LESS POPULAR OR USED. ITS A STRONG BOARD. :CG: :f: :AF: :beer:

10-11-01 09:50 AM

Quote:
esteaaz:

EVERYONE ALWAYS BITCHES .................BUTT THEY ALWAYS CUM BACK. THE BOARD IS NO LESS POPULAR OR USED. ITS A STRONG BOARD.
It's a strong board, like the Titanic, or the twin towers.

10-11-01 12:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jcmd62


Time for the mods and admin to stop forcing their "personal" views of negativity and discord on everyone. What they see thru their eyes, does not mean that anyone else views things this way.

Time for members to stop being banned for being themselves and expessing their opinions, even if those opinions are abrasive and tend to piss people off.

Time for those members who are so easily "pissed off" and who's feelings are so easily hurt, to learn to ignore and not keep constantly replying to and provoking the comments of the members that bother them so damn much.

Time for those same members to stop whining and bothering the mods and admin via dozens of crybaby PM's after replying and responding over and over to a member that they obviously dislike, blatently asking for the abuse that is so upsetting to them, and then using the mods to bail them out.

Time for the mods and admin to deal with the whiny ass PM senders as harshly as they do with everyone else, and to realize that these PM senders are just as guilty in the argument as the individual they are crying about.

Time for mods, admin and members alike to remember that this is a BB, and there are a lot more important things to worry about in this world than slx called me a c'unt.

I think the single most important maxim is the old usenet one

"Remember the human".

Everyone who posts here has differing views, opinions and emotions. Some people are thickskinned, or simply don't consider what is said online, or in a forum (even *this* forum) to be like speaking with someone in real life.

That's both true and untrue at the same time :

It's true when you consider that people here discuss things publically that they'd probably not even tell their own mother.......

It's untrue when you realise that whether you know me or not, calling me a Big Gay Horse, or whatever is considered by the poster to be a fitting insult might actually upset me...or anyone else it is aimed at.

When someone complains about a post, as everyone here is permitted to do when they see fit, the mod who is about will consider it carefully.

If the person being reported is known for being a bit insensitive, then they'll be dealt with in exactly the same way as a newbie who's first post has a pop at someone...

There are no absolutes here about how far someone has to go before one of the mods has a private word with them, or takes further action.

Everyone who's been around for a while knows full well who the hotheads are....and for the most part are probably more tolerant about them....

Although I, and the others spend a lot of time reading posts, we don't read everything...so if a hothead says something that goes unreported, we'll not take any action unless we see it ourselves.

That doesn't mean we cut them any slack, or are biased towards or against them. If someone chooses to start being insulting towards others, and do it on a regular basis, then it's probably that they will be spoken to.

Not only because they are repeating themselves as far as dodgy behaviour goes, but statistically it becomes more likely that they will be reported or noticed by a mod.

The only absolute is this : If someone complains about a post it WILL be investigated. It's then up to the mods to decide how we are going to deal with it.

As to jcmd62 not caring whether slx calls him a name or not...well up to a point that's between them.

But any name callers need to be fully aware that every post is potentially viewed by people who it wasn't intended for. People who might be disgusted/upset/thinskinned or *shock horror* children.

There are a few members here who are quite young. They may or may not know every swear word under the sun....that's their issue....but when someone decides to potentially teach them a few new words, the reaction of the community as a whole might be less tolerant.

As a mod, I do not consider that I am here to police or babysit anyone. I expect everyone to show a degree of communal spirit when they post....and that they know that they can only push the language used to a certain point before someone reacts, be it someone reporting a post or whatever.

If you or anyone else doesn't agree that the community policing themselves up to a point, with us here to guide/encourage/discourage as required is a good theng, then I suggest you look at the alternatives.

There are various forums which have absolute moderation. Anything posted goes to a mod who reads it before it is posted publically.

I'd not want to post anything under that sort of repressive atmosphere. I'd sure as hell not like to be a mod there.

There are usenet groups which are completely unmoderated in anyway - anything goes...and therefore every other word begins with "F".......

Find one of those and try to have a conversation with anyone about anything even half serious....and good luck to you.

Personal freedom, and freedom to post here is wonderful...but there are limits, and always will be.

If someone feels that they cannot post without insulting people, then perhaps they should think, then post.....

If someone feels the need to swear incessantly...perhaps they should go buy a dictionary, or a word of the day calender and try to expand their vocabulary.

I will personally be fairly tolerant of someone saying "this is fukking unfair"....but if they decided to say "Person a is a fukking moron, and person b smells" I'll react. And if person a or be complains, as they are well within their rights to, myself and the other mods are duty bound to investigate and react if necessary.

If someone reports something to a mod, it'll be looked at...and at no point will we begin to "punish" someone for reporting something that we consider unworthy of our time or attention.

That, quite frankly, is a dreadful idea.

rebel_mom 10-11-01 04:44 PM

love and hate are closely tied

alkizz 10-12-01 12:55 AM

yay

Dawn 10-12-01 12:55 AM

A bump for slx. ;)

greedy_lars 10-12-01 01:20 AM

oh man, im sooooo glad this great, deep, thought induceing thread is back....



























































not

Sinner 10-12-01 01:22 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by greedy_lars
oh man, im sooooo glad this great, deep, thought induceing thread is back....















































































not

rebel_mom 10-12-01 01:22 AM

FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10-12-01 01:25 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Dawn
A bump for slx. ;)

So is czar banned now, I'm asking you Dawn because you seem to know everything around here before it happens.

If thine eye offend thee, pluck it out huh moderators. Don't want anyone to see a mod starting and participating in a flame war, might be a little embarassing to admit that your not only human, but just as guilty for saying innapropriate things, and have absolutely no right to be judging anyone else.

Dawn 10-12-01 01:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jcmd62


So is czar banned now, I'm asking you Dawn because you seem to know everything around here before it happens.

If thine eye offend thee, pluck it out huh moderators. Don't want anyone to see a mod starting and participating in a flame war, might be a little embarassing to admit that your not only human, but just as guilty for saying innapropriate things, and have absolutely no right to be judging anyone else.
Jim, Czar is not banned. I dont know where you got that.

10-12-01 01:38 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Dawn
Jim, Czar is not banned. I dont know where you got that.

Nappy yanked a whole 6 page thread, It wouldn't surprise me if she also banned czar because of their comments.

I thought it was a perfectly logical question.

Pacewon 10-12-01 01:40 AM

there's only 2 banned members - sixx (by IP) and slx (restricted)

Dawn 10-12-01 01:41 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jcmd62


Nappy yanked a whole 6 page thread, It wouldn't surprise me if she also banned czar because of their comments.

I thought it was a perfectly logical question.
Yes, it was a logical question Jim. I was just repeating what I read earlier that Czar was not banned. ;)

Nicobie 10-12-01 01:53 AM

damn
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pacewon
there's only 2 banned members - sixx (by IP) and slx (restricted)


RESTRICTED?

You mean the Dillweed was reading my posts all this time?

You people crack me up.


(yes, there is a god)

esteeaz 10-12-01 07:59 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica

It's a strong board, like the Titanic, or the twin towers.

so your going to blow us up............hahahahahahahaha!!!!! no i know what you mean- but look your still posting:) :beer:

10-12-01 10:52 AM

I was informed by a couple of people that the thread was closed or deleted yesterday. I didn't delete or close anything myself. Is everything reinstated in this thread now? I'm not sure why the thread was knocked out for a while, but maybe someone complained about it to the administration? Or was it closed to "let things cool down"?

This is an open thread. All problems with it can be addressed inside, by posting your grievances here. If you go the administration and complain about this thread, how is poor ole ECLECTICA supposed to know? Whatever I'm doing wrong here, you should let me know, or otherwise I'll keep making the same mistake.

10-12-01 11:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica
I was informed by a couple of people that the thread was closed or deleted yesterday. I didn't delete or close anything myself. Is everything reinstated in this thread now? I'm not sure why the thread was knocked out for a while, but maybe someone complained about it to the administration? Or was it closed to "let things cool down"?

This is an open thread. All problems with it can be addressed inside, by posting your grievances here. If you go the administration and complain about this thread, how is poor ole ECLECTICA supposed to know? Whatever I'm doing wrong here, you should let me know, or otherwise I'll keep making the same mistake.

The short version. Nap-gal and czar had a lovers spat in your thread. When it got nasty, someone (a mod) deleted the whole thread. It has now been reinstated with the offensive posts by nappy and czar removed. Had nothing to do with you bro.

rebel_mom 10-12-01 12:01 PM

It wasn't deleted just suspended as they(mods/admin) discussed the thread.

It is as you know back minus the vulgarities.

greedy_lars 10-13-01 02:47 AM

busybody

rebel_mom 10-13-01 03:11 AM

:f: :f:

10-19-01 09:14 AM

After exchanging e-mails with SLX, I've learned that he and GAZDET were discussing the terms of SLX returning, and that the terms are roughly that SLX can no longer participate in controversial posts if he returns. In addition, the rest of SLX's family are also banned as he is. They are collateral damage, or guilty by association with SLX.

So basically SLX is not allowed back unless he changes his ways. To allow someone back conditionally, is no welcome at all. The old SLX as we knew him is no longer welcome here.

HellBound 10-19-01 02:38 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica
After exchanging e-mails with SLX, I've learned that he and GAZDET were discussing the terms of SLX returning, and that the terms are roughly that SLX can no longer participate in controversial posts if he returns. In addition, the rest of SLX's family are also banned as he is. They are collateral damage, or guilty by association with SLX.

So basically SLX is not allowed back unless he changes his ways. To allow someone back conditionally, is no welcome at all. The old SLX as we knew him is no longer welcome here.


and what's your point?

mike4947 10-19-01 02:46 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica
After exchanging e-mails with SLX, I've learned that he and GAZDET were discussing the terms of SLX returning, and that the terms are roughly that SLX can no longer participate in controversial posts if he returns. In addition, the rest of SLX's family are also banned as he is. They are collateral damage, or guilty by association with SLX.

So basically SLX is not allowed back unless he changes his ways. To allow someone back conditionally, is no welcome at all. The old SLX as we knew him is no longer welcome here.

Second hand information, that's why they don't allow hearsay testimony in courts.
You really should change your avatar logo to SLX's bitch:BL:
If this is the best you can do in finding a "cause" to fight for these days I feel sorry for you.:(

10-19-01 03:22 PM

Quote:
mike4947:

If this is the best you can do in finding a "cause" to fight for these days I feel sorry for you.
I'm not looking for a cause; it just comes naturally to me. On this board, I've been focused on this issue. I wonder what you would do, if you felt one of your friends was unfairly banned. Would you conveniently forget, and carry on as if things were business as usual? That's not something you should be proud of.

10-19-01 04:07 PM

napsterites
 
http://www.napsterites.org/forum/sh...?s=&threadid=44

gazdet 10-19-01 05:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica

I'm not looking for a cause; it just comes naturally to me. On this board, I've been focused on this issue. I wonder what you would do, if you felt one of your friends was unfairly banned. Would you conveniently forget, and carry on as if things were business as usual? That's not something you should be proud of.

Of course not eclectica, what you are doing is admirable for a friend.

I do consider Steve as an online friend too, he's a nice bloke.

I would suggest you ask him to sign in here as just that...."Steve".

Perhaps losing the "slx" persona and becoming a real part of napsterites in the essence for which we were formed, would work wonders.

He could be a great asset to any forum as such. :tu:

Dawn 10-19-01 05:27 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by gazdet


I would suggest you ask him to sign in here as just that...."Steve".

I suggested "Daisy". He didnt like it. :D

mike4947 10-19-01 05:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by eclectica

I'm not looking for a cause; it just comes naturally to me. On this board, I've been focused on this issue. I wonder what you would do, if you felt one of your friends was unfairly banned. Would you conveniently forget, and carry on as if things were business as usual? That's not something you should be proud of.


Well it seems none of my friends have done anything even remotely near getting banned. Personal attacks on the order the the nameless one spewed out I believe WERE cause for being banned.
Seems no one is stopping him from returning except himself.

Nicobie 10-19-01 06:04 PM

The sooner slx gets let back in,

the sooner he can be rebanned!

The banning is the fun part anyway.

[chuckle]

10-20-01 03:10 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by gazdet


Of course not eclectica, what you are doing is admirable for a friend.

I do consider Steve as an online friend too, he's a nice bloke.

I would suggest you ask him to sign in here as just that...."Steve".

Perhaps losing the "slx" persona and becoming a real part of napsterites in the essence for which we were formed, would work wonders.

He could be a great asset to any forum as such. :tu:


I don't see anyone asking czar to sign in as "Tommy" nor do I see him being asked to change. Yet I do see his posts being deleted because of their content.

What makes slx so much worse that he must change to return? I don't remember any of his posts being deleted because they were so bad that the rest of the board shouldn't even read them.

Maybe we should all have to sign in as "ourselves" and leave our "baggage" at the door. Whats next? A guideline saying that no one is allowed to disagree or say a negative word to each other?

I appreciate that this place was set up as a "friendly" forum, but it's being strangled into nothingness by "niceness". Is that what the members want? A place that people join, spend a day or two watching the same 20 people post the same boring shit , then leave and never return?

It's pretty sad when someone posts a "I need help" thread and people are so damn bored and dying to post something that they will actually take the time to post "sorry can't help ya" and then a half dozen stupid smilies. This place is starting to become nothing more than a race to see who can post the most smilies and pointless posts to keep that almighty and oh so ego boosting post count climbing.

For those that are thinking well if you don't like it you can leave, you bet yer ass I can, as a lot of members have already done so. How many members does the napsterites now boast? 300, 400 members, where are they? Why is the first page always the same 10 or 20 members posts. Why do all these new names I see that are signing up, never seem to stick around?

Because of czar or slx, or the "controversial" posts that they submit? Not very likely. We need more czar's and slx's and their controversy. Most of all we need posts with more content. You need to do away with that worthless post counter and maybe people will start worrying about the quality of their posts and not the damn "quantity" of them.

I don't want to group czar and slx together, they are entirely two different posters. I have to say that slx did not stoop to the level of personal hatred that Tommy does. Wishing death on someone and the recent posts that were deleted are by FAR worse than anything slx did, and yet tommy's here posting and slx isn't.

I have stopped starting threads. I'm tired of "serious" threads being frowned on, then watching them get hijacked or buried under countless cocksucker, penis and how many times do you wipe yer ass threads. I check in once in a while to try to find a thread to reply to, and this is one of few. I don't think slx or anyone has ever posed a serious threat to this forums "friendly" atmosphere.

I think that restrictions, the heavy handed way that members are forced to "get along" and the "you have to be checked out before you can join" registration process are doing a fine job of driving members and potential members away.

Dawn 10-20-01 03:18 AM

God Jim, why don't you slam this place a bit harder. I guess I'm guilty alot of those "useless" threads and posts you are talking about. Sorry to have wasted your time.

And if you have a link to a good forum that doens't have page one filled with the top 20 posters, I'd like to check it out. PM me the link. Thanks

10-20-01 03:30 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mike4947



Well it seems none of my friends have done anything even remotely near getting banned. Personal attacks on the order the the nameless one spewed out I believe WERE cause for being banned.
Seems no one is stopping him from returning except himself.

Listen to the former king of personal attacks talking, just because you have turned into Mr. Mamby since leaving speak out, I think you have gall talking about slx.

How come you never offer a quote or two of the horrible personal attacks that you accuse slx of. Because there are none, or at least very few. C'mon mike show me some of those personal attacks he spewed out.

You have to have friends in order to have them banned. Why would anyone go to the lengths that they have to get slx reinstated? Would anyone do the same for you? I think your jealous that ole slx has friends that would fight this hard for him, and poor ole mike wouldn't even be missed.

Poor mikey, slx isn't even here and he gets more attention than you. So mouth you accuse, give me some proof of these horrible attacks that he committed. Being banned only proves that he pissed off Tg. Somehow I doubt slx was the first to call her a c'unt. I have no doubt it pissed her off and that in less than a week of doing so he was banned.

Far from a personal attack the likes of which you seem to be referring to, and rather mild compared to some of our other illustrious members "personal attacks".

Ramona_A_Stone 10-20-01 03:33 AM

Hmmmm.

Now, who was it just the other day who uttered the famous words:

"If you feel so insecure and unpatriotic, you could always......


...................MOVE!
"

Why, gee, Jim, I think it was you

Dawn 10-20-01 03:47 AM

I just looked closely at the threads page. I see a wide variety of topics, including news, jokes, tech help and questions, bitching, surveys, politics, games, simple observations, etc etc........ which is exactly what a message board is for. You lost me on that one Jim.

10-20-01 04:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Ramona_A_Stone
Hmmmm.

Now, who was it just the other day who uttered the famous words:

"If you feel so insecure and unpatriotic, you could always......


...................MOVE!
"

Why, gee, Jim, I think it was you

Sorry Sean but unlike you I don't "live" here, I said that to you because you seem to be ashamed of the country you reside in, and where you LIVE. This is a BB dude, not life.

I agree with you and I don't post here near as much as I used to, as I clearly stated. If that soon becomes not at all, so be it. It's not like I am asking nor expect you to miss me. Of course I don't have my own little forum to mod, and can see how you would be threatened.

Sorry bro, no ones gonna take away your little fantasy world, and you can continue to mod that extremely busy place, and have all these oh so important people look up to the great Ramona Stone. Now go write a song about what an asshole I am for voicing my OPINION.

Sorry Dawn it seems that I can't post anything that doesn't piss you off anymore. Once again you take my comments as a personal attack when they are far from it. It does prove the point that no matter what you say or how you say it, someone will take it personally. You know full well that I have enjoyed your serious posts and that I know you are quite capable of more than mamby.

Ramona_A_Stone 10-20-01 04:18 AM

gee dude....... you sure do use a lot of big words......... it took a long time to work that reply up i'd bet... you must spend a lot of time thinkin' bout ol' ramona and postin' about her here on the board......bless your heart

i'm flattered for the attention........ ol' ramona can use all she can get, good or bad makes no difference as long as people are talking about me

now i'm a little slow, but i'd bet a shiny nickel if you read my words again, you'll see ....well... they were your words......... now if that's how you choose to see it though..... not much ol' ramona can do about that........ maybe you need to try breathing into a paper sack dude.......

10-20-01 04:37 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Ramona_A_Stone
gee dude....... you sure do use a lot of big words......... it took a long time to work that reply up i'd bet... you must spend a lot of time thinkin' bout ol' ramona and postin' about her here on the board......bless your heart

i'm flattered for the attention........ ol' ramona can use all she can get, good or bad makes no difference as long as people are talking about me

now i'm a little slow, but i'd bet a shiny nickel if you read my words again, you'll see ....well... they were your words......... now if that's how you choose to see it though..... not much ol' ramona can do about that........ maybe you need to try breathing into a paper sack dude.......

[Geez Sean take a valium, your so upset you can't even read. My remarks really seem to have hit close to home. Thanx for keeping slx's thread at the top. I see my post has had the desired effect.

Are you never going to forgive ole slx for that stupid damn parody of you? It's really not healthy to hold a grudge so long.

CZAR 10-20-01 08:30 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by jcmd62


Being banned only proves that he pissed off Tg. Somehow I doubt slx was the first to call her a c'unt. I have no doubt it pissed her off and that in less than a week of doing so he was banned.

it was probably personal.......i called Napdike alot worse and i make a point to at least once a day call gaz the shittiest admin on the web and i'm still here.....

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


slx is a moron btw

10-20-01 09:19 AM

:AF: Can't we all just get along? :V:
























































No, because the entity "we" doesn't exist here in its fullest form, as some of us are banned. GAZDET, you always said that you wanted all the napsterites together on one board, but the actions of banning and restricting, and treating people like children has driven people away; actions speak louder than words. And YOU are the one responsible, as the chain of command ends at you: YOU ARE NEGLIGENT.

Wenchie 10-20-01 09:32 AM

:SP: Gaz...youre a VERY naughty boy !!

:rofl::CG:

Dawn 10-20-01 11:47 AM

Quote:
Sorry Dawn it seems that I can't post anything that doesn't piss you off anymore. Once again you take my comments as a personal attack when they are far from it.

I didn't take that as a personal attack Jim. I was just replying that I may be guilty of the things you were pointing out. I did come back and post again about the threads, and how diversified I thought they were. I was only commenting on your statements.

And I think your statement that you can't post anything without pissing me off is ridiculous. I have been angry at you only once. And that lasted all of about 1 minute. :hmm:

I hope slx gets unbanned soon so this thread is no longer needed. :ND:

:beer:

rebel_mom 10-20-01 02:06 PM



CAN SANDY FLOOP AND SLX BE UNBANNED NOW PLEASE

CZAR 10-20-01 08:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by rebel_mom


CAN SANDY FLOOP AND SLX BE UNBANNED NOW PLEASE

oh yes....please bring back Rosy and hannabanna.......i'd love to be able to partake in lively, spirited conversations with them....they are such great dipshits....opps i mean people

Ninombre 10-20-01 08:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by CZAR


oh yes....please bring back Rosy and hannabanna.......i'd love to be able to partake in lively, spirited conversations with them....they are such great dipshits....opps i mean people

oh yeah, bring back the hannah ... Floop and his banana ... I want bible stuff and paranoia :AP:

r_m ... don't know what makes slx so special, as far as I've seen he was mainly complaining about this forum, the mods and its admin - IMHO it's quite difficult to understand why he wants to come back in spite of all these "disgusting" things ...

rebel_mom 10-20-01 09:23 PM

it is not the people so much as the unbanning I am asking for but I have ended my quest .

Nicobie 10-20-01 10:16 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by rebel_mom
[BI have ended my quest . [/B]

:BL:


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2004, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.