I had not spoken to Sandy in several weeks and have come to find out she does not want back on the forum , mainly because ahe did not agree with the conditions she needed to comply to.

As for SLx IMO more people have whined about his whining then any complaints he may have and still has.

I am also of the understanding if he can not be himself he is in essence not welcome back . Slx does not want to conform to conditions stipulated.

edit: lastnight apparently after i went to sleep a convo was had on msn.

:J:

hi there rebel_mom

That's quite an interesting statement. I wonder who "informed" you of the lack of communication. Because I know for a fact that there has been communication. I have been in the chat with them.

I'm not here to say what was said, but believe me, they HAVE talked. I was there.

Jas they did some talking. enough to make my head hurt :ND:

Hi Strangeone.:)


Dawn Slx told me lastnight that no one has answered his or his families e~mails . He did say he spoke with Gaz on Aim but no answers were given.

:AP:


Hi there dawn how you doing????.....

Why I'm just fantastic thank you. Hope you are doing good too!

Nice to see you around. Been a while ;)

:was:

:tu: And at least I can appreciate the humor of altered quotes!

Why was slx "permanently" banned? Has anyone ever been permanently banned from this board?


Can anyone answer this?

for Trolling.............like behaviours and yes Sandy and Floopster as well.

I thought slx was banned 'cauce he was UGLY.

[chuckle]

Sandy and Floopster are PERMANENTLY banned??????

What's going on here? I seem to remember someone saying no one was banned, only temporarily restricted. Have the rules changed?

I know from Sandy and Slx that they may return if they choose to change their behaviours, and speaking out in confrontation mode.

I know Slx must change is name as well .

Floopster I am not sure about but i think if they choose to conform they are welcome back with restrictions.

I was told that Slx and Sandy must drop speaking out against GAZ and they can return ,if not they are not being unbanned.

:rofl: I'm glad you haven't lost your sense of humour, eclectica. :tu:

Isn't term 'person' a bit too much for Slx - knowing that Slx is just an online creation of Steve who is the real person. You're talking about Slx changing his name and ways - how unreal you want it to get? :BL: Whining about his suspension and mourning about the fate of 'his' ill-treated family is about as hilarious (or pathetic, depending on viewpoint) as protesting about the death of a novel character. I have no doubt that the 'Socrates of Internet' has been having a lot of fun following the emotional reactions of people taking Slx seriously and watching his faithful zombies keeping the game up. :CE: :BL:

Gaz has made it clear earlier in this same thread that we are not interested to have Slx the troll back. Steve the real guy is of course a different story. I know Gaz has been having a long chat with Steve recently and the channel is open for further discussions. Having a brain Steve is surely perfectly capable of negotiating for himself and quite honestly your unintelligent and repetetive whining bears no relevance to these negotiations. Steve himself is the one to make decisions about his online behaviour and convey these decisions to the admins in a credible manner.

- tg ;)

ps. don't shout - Gaz is not in a cave, he's sleeping in his bed (4.45 am in his place) and we don't want to wake him up yet! :W:

I take offense at the Socrates comment....slx is nothing like him...

and

that is no way to eclectica....


do you drink blood//??\\

I think eclectica has come up with a number of pretty flattering terms to his master... but of course knowing eclectica's zombie position (which by definition prevents him from using his own brain) we have to assume that Slx himself has coined these titles to himself... and knowing that Slx is actually a fictional creation of Steve to have some online fun... OMG I'm getting a headache LOL! :rofl: :rofl:

- tg ;)

ps. yes, I do drink blood. :lol2:

So why is czar allowed to be here???? That is the double standard, tg. Czar wished death upon a woman who has been thru a difficult struggle to regain her health. Why is that okay behavior? Is it okay if czar wishes death for LBF, who has equally been thru a most difficult struggle to regain her health? Whatever punishment given to slx, should be equally given to czar. Or, there remains a double standard.

Hi Belle,

Don't forget that we have to factor in age.

Czar is a young prick.

slx is a old prick.

:)

Yeah, right.

A prick is a prick is a prick.

Czar is a man, and should be held responsible for vicious attacks on other members. Czar gets a slap on his fingers, others get permanently banned. I'm just confused about the situation.

Czar has been suspended on several occasions, the last break being a fairly long one and not so long ago. So he has been held responsible for his posting like any other. What he said to Sue was not okay and he was privately contacted about it. Single abusive posts don't automatically lead to further 'punishments' beyond the removal of the post and the possible warning of the poster. Slx and Czar are two quite different posters and saying that "Whatever punishment given to slx, should be equally given to czar" is oversimplification. They both are dealt with individually as they should.

- tg ;)

So if slx comes back as 'Steve', and makes only one vicious attack on another member, Steve will be privately contacted and allowed to stay??:con:

TG no disrespect here but that is bullmilk..................in it's finest fashion. A simple way of dodging a answer to a straight forward question.

Czar likely adhered to the "rules " to get back to posting.

I think in Slx/Steves case he refuses to be anyone other then the person he has created for the forum and that is ultimately why he as well as Sandy are not back..............because they refuse to conform to the ideals of Gaz .

I don't believe calling Eclectica Slx's zombie is appropriate either since he has every right to voice his views wether you or anyone else like them , just as you and others need not read them if you so choose .

If Steve comes here as Steve without playing his Slx games that would be a whole new situation. Perhaps there would be no moderation issues with him at all. Or if there were, the private communications might work better with the real guy than with 'Slx' - at least they would be worth trying.

- tg ;)

I like sugar cookies

You will be privately contacted for that. :S: :CG: :att:

- tg ;)

Yes, but that is exactly my point. Czar is still playing czar games, the situation has not changed. And czar is still czar, no new name required.

you do realize that people think that me and you have some kind of secret friendship going on don't ya :p

I wouldn't even dream of having a private chat with such a yucky blue troll! :PUK: :CG: :to2:

I'd rather be :abd: by a bunch of :AY:s! :BL: :afi:

- tg ;)

:eek:

Honest question: why does slx want back in?

He professed to disdain everything about this forum, all of its mods and rules, and the largest percentage of the people here. Then, after accusing us of perpetrating virtual rape on his whole family, did he somehow start to like us better? Or is he just addicted to the negative attention?

Has something changed? ...or not?

I think it has become a matter of principle now not need or want.

Belle made some valid points about the flavour of trolling so to speak.

Slx's so called trolling was often annoying and absurd but never violent in its implications. More of a verbal cluster f*uck meant to be twisted and misconstrued to rile and aggravate or simple to just baffle.

He never posted Gaz knob gobbling, or other vulgarities unless a pissing monkey is in that category , just so called whined and complained ...................not a crime worth a 53 day banning,nor his family, believed in there existance or not until proven, they remain his family.

I am curious to know what Czar had to agree to be unbanned.
Also in the exchange os unpleasantries did the mod get a reprimand for provoking a known flamer?

Complete and utter BULLSHIT Sean, just like the other mods you only choose to see the disdainful posts he made and selectively ignore all the other perfectly legit and normal posts he made. More double standards and yet by another mod.

But SLX was a critic, and he was critical because he cared about the forum. If he didn't care, then he could have just turned his back on this forum. He should be let back in regardless of whether he wants to be let back in.

Also, he didn't accuse us of rape, but rather his sister, GOSSIPER, made an analogy of the bannings to a rape. You can check it here in this thread:
http://www.napsterites.net/undergro...=&threadid=5078

This, coming from the guy who led the campaign to make Sue the bad guy for being wished death. :RE:

Not that czar wasn't out of line, but Nap-girl was the "bad guy" for responding to his post, that had NOTHING to do with her, she initiated it with a threat of her own, and then went toe to toe trading insults of her own. Once again you only see what furthers your cause of the mods are NEVER wrong.

nothing.

i emailed TG asking to be unbanned so i could archive and collect some of my old posts...

in the meantime appearently Ice had unbanned me and sent me an email telling me that.


and Sandy...opps i mean Belle....you should be tortured with fish hooks until you scream in agony.....but thats just an opinion


-cheers!:tu:

What the f'uck did I do man? I'm on topic.

Well, since it's a media campaign and all and there have been about 40 subjects in the thread so far, I thought any and all substance was a go, as long as it got ratings.

:BL:

btw, Jc, if you insist on attempting to call me by my real name, learn how to spell it, it'll feel much more personal.

I apologize dude, I could have sworn that you told me once that you did NOT spell it like Mr. Fanning did, I must've confused my conversations. It has been a while since we conversed outside forumland.

That's right czar, gloat over the fact that you are here and Sandy is not.

How 'bout a fish hook in your fat little mouth.....you look like whale bait to me.

observation! you are just as bad as he is, you do everything he does, you just use different words. I am not innocent, I do it also, alot of us do, just some don't cry to daddy when it gets too much for us to handle. Now go cook me some sugar cookies pweaze :J:

Just as bad as he is?? Not by a long shot, sorry. And good bye to you, sixxy sweety.:KSY:

you could never be as bad as me....you dont have the intelligence.


are you gonna leave now?

flames to much for you?


















































owned little bitch

You are so right....everyone should follow this advice......

It is time this board was put to rest....

deja vu
 

SLX: master of puppets
 

Re: SLX: master of puppets
 

i dont know about puppets but i hear he's a good fisherman, in fact i hear he's achieved the lofty position of Master Baiter.

I've always felt that attacking a person's characteristics - rather that countering their opinions - means that you don't have a logical argument to counter with... thereby supporting your opponents point of view.

"Master of Puppets", eh? A classic Metallica song. How it applies to slx...?

To be a master of puppets, you have to have control of your puppets behavior - if not their thoughts. The only people who fully support slx - that I can tell - are eclectica and Jc, (Using that analogy, of course). But they also appear to have his thoughts as well.

... So who are slx's puppets?

Re: Re: SLX: master of puppets
 

:BYL: :BGS: