eclectica
2004-01-02, 19:35
http://www.sharmannetworks.com/design/corporate/images/logo_sharman.gif
Sharman Networks (http://www.sharmannetworks.com) is a profit oriented company which makes the most popular p2p application, Kazaa. They are also involved in some other business projects and spinoffs. They have no ethics or morals in their behavior, and have shown a willingness to sue anyone in order to further their business interests. They have sued the filesharing portal Slyck (http://www.slyck.com) and anything related to or linking to Kazaa Lite (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=119). Kazaa Lite is a version of the Kazaa program which does not have spyware or adware, and so they don't make any money off of it. The only driving force behind the company is profit and greed. I wouldn't be surprised if the mysterious ES5 (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89) program is actually affiliated with them and is intended to be a revenue generating service that offers among other things, child pornography without fear of legal troubles for its users.
Their location is elusive, without having any court or jurisdiction to hold them accountable. Some of the names associated with the company are: Niklas Zennstrom & Janus Friis (Kazaa founders), Nikki Hemming (CEO), Alan Morris (Executive Vice President), Derek Broes (Executive Vice President Altnet) Kevin Bermeister (head of Brilliant Digital Entertainment and Altnet), Phil Morle (technical director), Roderick Dorman (chief litigation counsel), and Philip Corwin (lobbyist).
Sharman Networks is the bane of peer-to-peer filesharing. While we rally behind them when they take on the RIAA, it is only for their self-interest that they have been fighting against the RIAA. With their millions of dollars it is an outrage that they have provided no support whatsoever for the many p2p users who were sued by the RIAA. These p2p users earn them revenue by being subjected to their adware and spyware, and in return they have only been rewarded with the impotence and silence of Sharman Neworks.
Because Sharman Networks makes money itself, with their commercialized p2p (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84), it puts people in an ethical bind because the money is going to someone besides the musicians. This gives credence to the arguments (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=125) that p2p filesharing is equivalent to stealing. If p2p filesharing is free, then you can argue that people are freely sharing what they like with others. But once someone profits from p2p, then it does indeed become immoral. Sharman Networks and its commercialism is a poisonous, corrupted path that has everything to do with greedy profit and nothing to do with a love of the music.
Sharman Networks (http://www.sharmannetworks.com) is a profit oriented company which makes the most popular p2p application, Kazaa. They are also involved in some other business projects and spinoffs. They have no ethics or morals in their behavior, and have shown a willingness to sue anyone in order to further their business interests. They have sued the filesharing portal Slyck (http://www.slyck.com) and anything related to or linking to Kazaa Lite (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=119). Kazaa Lite is a version of the Kazaa program which does not have spyware or adware, and so they don't make any money off of it. The only driving force behind the company is profit and greed. I wouldn't be surprised if the mysterious ES5 (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89) program is actually affiliated with them and is intended to be a revenue generating service that offers among other things, child pornography without fear of legal troubles for its users.
Their location is elusive, without having any court or jurisdiction to hold them accountable. Some of the names associated with the company are: Niklas Zennstrom & Janus Friis (Kazaa founders), Nikki Hemming (CEO), Alan Morris (Executive Vice President), Derek Broes (Executive Vice President Altnet) Kevin Bermeister (head of Brilliant Digital Entertainment and Altnet), Phil Morle (technical director), Roderick Dorman (chief litigation counsel), and Philip Corwin (lobbyist).
Sharman Networks is the bane of peer-to-peer filesharing. While we rally behind them when they take on the RIAA, it is only for their self-interest that they have been fighting against the RIAA. With their millions of dollars it is an outrage that they have provided no support whatsoever for the many p2p users who were sued by the RIAA. These p2p users earn them revenue by being subjected to their adware and spyware, and in return they have only been rewarded with the impotence and silence of Sharman Neworks.
Because Sharman Networks makes money itself, with their commercialized p2p (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84), it puts people in an ethical bind because the money is going to someone besides the musicians. This gives credence to the arguments (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=125) that p2p filesharing is equivalent to stealing. If p2p filesharing is free, then you can argue that people are freely sharing what they like with others. But once someone profits from p2p, then it does indeed become immoral. Sharman Networks and its commercialism is a poisonous, corrupted path that has everything to do with greedy profit and nothing to do with a love of the music.