eclectica
2004-08-02, 02:32
I get almost obsessed sometimes with tall buildings or other monstrosities that are manmade. I used to be obsessed with the Twin Towers in the sense that I couldn't help but notice them or even feel an eeriness whenever looking at them. Modern architecture is clever and it creates buildings which don't look stable. The architects get credit for their cleverness by designing something that still stands and is cheaper to build. The problem with modern buildings is that although they can withstand normal forces like wind, they can not withstand unforseen forces such as acts of terrorism. The very property and design of them which is called clever is also a weakness which makes them fall down when put to the extreme tests.
One building that scares me now is the 915 foot / 279 meter Citicorp building, located at Lexington Ave. and 53rd Street in Manhattan. It has a slanted roof for solar panels. Another oddity of it is that it does not have any beams touching the ground on its four corners. Look at the picture (http://www.newyork-net.de/images/CitiCorp2.jpg) of its base and you can see that the main support columns are in the middle of the four sides rather than on the corners. Whenever I see the building I feel that it is unstable.
And it's not just me. Read some excerpts from various sites about its weak design:
http://www.nyu.edu/classes/finearts/nyc/park/citicorp.html
A computer driven load mass damper enables the reduced number of vertical supports and ensures the stability of this complex structure.
http://www.poly.edu/polypress/no_bldg.cfm
LeMessurier once uncovered a potentially fatal flaw in the Citicorp Building after a graduate student questioned him. The building's beams had been bolted rather than welded, leaving it vulnerable to some hurricanes. After the flaw was discovered, the Citicorp building's beam were welded together, LeMcsurier said."
http://www.ctbuh.org/htmlfiles/featured_buildings/bom_citi.html
Most of the building's load (half the gravity and all the wind load) is directed to the trussed frame on the outside of the tower. The core carries the remaining gravity loads.
The four columns were originally designed to stand at the building's corners, but this design would have interfered with the new church's desire for a "free sky." Structural engineer Le Messurier decided instead to move the four columns closer to the structure's center, thus clearing space for the church under the corner of the building.
To reduce swaying of the structure in heavy winds, a revolutionary system was designed in the building's crown on the 63rd floor. A tuned mass damper (TMD) consists of a 400-ton concrete slab that counteracts swaying much like a shock absorber. The damper reduces swaying of the building by up to 40%.
They raised the terror alert today in New York, and this Citibank building is one that they are worried will be attacked. That's what got me thinking about it to start with.
When my wife was in the hospital for a week she had a room which had a view of the building. It was raining a lot and at night when the lights were on the building it looked like a monster similar to the avatar (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/image.php?u=6&dateline=1077848420) of Beejus amidst the fog of the low clouds. I didn't find a night picture of it from that angle, but see this picture here (http://www.wirednewyork.com/skyscrapers/citigroup/images/citicorp_lex.jpg) and see if you can see what I mean. The black area would be its mouth and at night the top corners are lit, looking like eyes.
What kind of things do you find in your world that are fascinating or awe inspiring?
One building that scares me now is the 915 foot / 279 meter Citicorp building, located at Lexington Ave. and 53rd Street in Manhattan. It has a slanted roof for solar panels. Another oddity of it is that it does not have any beams touching the ground on its four corners. Look at the picture (http://www.newyork-net.de/images/CitiCorp2.jpg) of its base and you can see that the main support columns are in the middle of the four sides rather than on the corners. Whenever I see the building I feel that it is unstable.
And it's not just me. Read some excerpts from various sites about its weak design:
http://www.nyu.edu/classes/finearts/nyc/park/citicorp.html
A computer driven load mass damper enables the reduced number of vertical supports and ensures the stability of this complex structure.
http://www.poly.edu/polypress/no_bldg.cfm
LeMessurier once uncovered a potentially fatal flaw in the Citicorp Building after a graduate student questioned him. The building's beams had been bolted rather than welded, leaving it vulnerable to some hurricanes. After the flaw was discovered, the Citicorp building's beam were welded together, LeMcsurier said."
http://www.ctbuh.org/htmlfiles/featured_buildings/bom_citi.html
Most of the building's load (half the gravity and all the wind load) is directed to the trussed frame on the outside of the tower. The core carries the remaining gravity loads.
The four columns were originally designed to stand at the building's corners, but this design would have interfered with the new church's desire for a "free sky." Structural engineer Le Messurier decided instead to move the four columns closer to the structure's center, thus clearing space for the church under the corner of the building.
To reduce swaying of the structure in heavy winds, a revolutionary system was designed in the building's crown on the 63rd floor. A tuned mass damper (TMD) consists of a 400-ton concrete slab that counteracts swaying much like a shock absorber. The damper reduces swaying of the building by up to 40%.
They raised the terror alert today in New York, and this Citibank building is one that they are worried will be attacked. That's what got me thinking about it to start with.
When my wife was in the hospital for a week she had a room which had a view of the building. It was raining a lot and at night when the lights were on the building it looked like a monster similar to the avatar (http://www.3-3-3.org/forum/image.php?u=6&dateline=1077848420) of Beejus amidst the fog of the low clouds. I didn't find a night picture of it from that angle, but see this picture here (http://www.wirednewyork.com/skyscrapers/citigroup/images/citicorp_lex.jpg) and see if you can see what I mean. The black area would be its mouth and at night the top corners are lit, looking like eyes.
What kind of things do you find in your world that are fascinating or awe inspiring?